|
March 2010
|
|
Greek Signal by Germany (and France) will help Eurozone, not just Athens
The major nations of the eurozone have agreed on a $25 billion bail-out plan for Greece, a crucial first step in practical help and solidarity from the EU to help one of its weakest member-states survive its debt crisis.
The deal, reportedly to be announced in Brussels on Monday, marks a turning-point in the 10-year history of the euro. It is the first time that radical weaknesses have been exposed in the single-currency system that could lead to its collapse – and the first time that richer partners have been obliged to intervene to save their wayward weaker partners.
Germany, the biggest EU economy, is fiercely reluctant to spend money helping out a southern European country that has cheated on the rules for being part of the eurozone. But Berlin and Paris finally seem to have agreed to put up financial guarantees (and cash if necessary) to preserve the integrity and reputation of the euro, the EU’s boldest achievement so far.
The timing can be explained by three factors. The time it took for other EU states to measure the Greek predicament – and its implications for the euro. The time it took for the Greek government to show everyone that it was determined to make Greek citizens pay with major sacrifices before fellow EU countries, notably Germany, decided to ante up funds to save the Greeks’ from bankruptcy. The Greek prime minister has just completed a swing through Washington and EU capitals to convince his fellow leaders of his (Socialist) government’s determination to push through tough public service and entitlement reforms despite stiff public opposition in the streets. And the time to make international speculators realize that their hopes – of a quick killing – have started to look premature.
Such a deal has long been expected, but rumors in Brussels that it has materialized had the effect of raising the value of the euro in world markets.
The help, if it materializes, will make it easier to Athens to borrow more money in international markets at reasonable rates. It will also relieve pressure on all the most indebted eurozone countries – the PIIGS, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain – to stave off attacks on their national borrowing by hedge funds and other players ready to bet against them as countries liable to default on their national debts.
The message from Brussels is that the big successful economies in the eurozone – notably Germany and France – will not let that happen. So hedge funds that are borrowing money to bet against Greece (and the other PIIGS) face the prospect of having to pay back their own loans on very expensive terms of themselves – a prospect likely to inhibit more speculation.
As part of the deal being forged in Brussels, Germany and France are demanding that the eurozone rewrite its rule book about economic convergence, including sanctions against governments (such as Greece’s) that deceive their EU partners about their real financial situation.
The emergence of changes of this sort, including effective measures of discipline against offending eurozone countries, the new fiscal discipline and beginning of collective economic governance among the eurozone countries, could an important step forward to the EU’s global clout. Such progress toward economic coherence and credibility could amount to progress on a par with the Lisbon treaty – and, for the long run, a silver lining to the current economic hardship being inflicted on the EU economies. |
|
|
Roundtables
|
|
02/23/10 |
|
On February 23, 2010, The European Institute held a special breakfast meeting of its Transatlantic Roundtable on Financial and Monetary Affairs with His Excellency Vassilis Kaskarelis, Ambassador of Greece to the United States, who spoke about the implications of Greece’s financial crisis.
Ambassador Kaskarelis explained that serious structural problems have existed in Greece for 7 years and that for most of 2009, no action was taken to correct these problems due to the upcoming elections. As a result, he argued that the new government elected in October 2009 faces the herculean task of solving Greece’s longstanding financial woes. Ambassador Kaskarelis said that he is optimistic for Greece’s future because this is the first time that the EU is enforcing specific economic measures in Greece and he believes that Greece has hit rock bottom, which means that people will soon start buying and investing in Greece again.
The Ambassador remarked that while the current crisis needs guidance from Brussels, domestic concerns must also be taken into consideration. He argued that if the Greek people do not approve of the measures implemented by external actors, the government will lose the next election and the reform process will be stalled or possibly halted. Reform will take time, the Ambassador emphasized, and he advocated for selling these reform measures to the public the right way in order to avoid a social crisis.
Finally, Ambassador Kaskarelis turned to Europe and the impact on the Eurozone. He argued that the situation in Greece is not unlike financial crises other EU countries have faced; Greece is just the first country to allow the crisis to go this far. The Ambassador argued that measures could have been imposed on Greece last year by the EU if the process to do so had been clearer and less complicated. He stated that the problems in Greece affect the whole of the EU, not just the Eurozone and that the EU is testing how much they can react to this situation. Ambassador Kaskarelis believes that the EU is reluctant to loan money to Greece because they fear what will happen if another Eurozone country faces a similar problem. He concluded by saying that decisions have to be made and it is up to Europe because Greece has already made their decisions. |
|
February – March 2010
|
|
Written by Written by J. Paul Horne
|
|
As the “Great Recession” recedes, the aftershocks of public anger are exploding with a political passion not seen since the Great Depression.. In this tumult, knives are out for the two leading central banks – the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB), the agencies responsible for monetary policies underpinning the world’s most important economies and markets.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Roundtables
|
|
09/27/07 |
|
The Honorable Lucas Papademos, Vice-President of the European Central Bank addressed the role of the Central Bank in dealing with the current turmoil in global financial markets, as well as the prospects for the European economy. This dinner discussion was hosted in New York City in cooperation with BlackRock, Inc. |
|
Roundtables
|
|
04/24/09 |
|
Convened on the eve of the IMF and World Bank Spring meetings, this seminar gathered U.S. and European policy-makers to discuss the role of transatlantic cooperation in turning the crisis into an opportunity for better global financial governance. The need for closer regulatory coordination between the United States and the European Union emerged as a widely-shared conclusion among the participants, including The Honorable Paul Kanjorski, Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises and Stefano Manservisi, Director General, DG Development, The European Commission. Willy Kiekens, Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund, and Elizabeth Jacobs, Deputy Director, Office of International Affairs, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission outlined the priorities of their respective organization. The Honorable Erkki Liikanen, Member of the European Central Bank Governing Council and Governor of the Bank of Finland echoes this call for increased coordination between the US and Europe, as well as among European States. The Honorable Luc Frieden, Minister of the Treasury for the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg offered the luncheon keynote address. The meeting was moderated by Daniel Duncan, Senior Director of Government Affairs, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |