Europeans and Other Foreign Companies Line Up for US High-Speed Rail “Gold Rush”     Print Email

(October 7) Notwithstanding a “buy America” requirement, European railroad engineering firms are lining up eagerly and in force to enter what they see as a modern day “gold rush” to get a stake in the U.S. high speed rail market, fueled by President Obama’s $8 billion in stimulus funds.  So far, 13 routes in a wide geographic area, including California and Florida, have been proposed.  See recent European Affairs article raising the curtain on this push.

Europeans are hoping to get an edge because of the highly developed rail systems in Europe and because they have experience and capabilities to seize the opportunity.  Competition will be keen, however, from Asian and Canadian companies.  Thirty eight  companies have officially registered interest in the proposed Tampa-Orlando-Miami route.  One industry estimate is that starting in 2011 the US market for high speed rail could number 145 trains and more than 1,000 cars.

Germany’s Siemens will showcase its Velaro ICE trains in Florida this week in advance of the bidding process in the state.  The Velaro trains can travel up to 250 miles per hour, but the gleaming train cars are sitting on trucks in Florida because the special tracks they require have not yet been built.

Bombadier, headquartered Canada, will be a tough competitor.  Bombadier already has experience in what passes for the nascent  US high speed market--the Acela Express lines along the northeast corridor, Washington-New York-Boston. The Acela can reach speeds of 150 miles per hour, but generally averages less than half of that.

Both Siemens and Bombadier have large plants in the US, which will comply with the “Buy America” provisions.  Bombadier has recently expanded its plant in Plattsburgh, NY and Siemens has purchased land adjacent to its large Sacramento facility in order to expand and meet the high speed opportunity.  (Siemens employee 70,000 people in the US already.)

Of course, high speed rail is hardly a done deal in the US.  The Obama Administration’s $8 billion is seed money only, and multiples of that figure will be required to implement the high speed routes, which require expensive new lines through populated areas.   Cost estimates for all thirteen proposed routes combined range from hundreds of billions to $1 trillion.  Another possible stumbling block is political opposition from some Republicans who, in full election mode, have seized on the rail plan as another example of government overreach.

By Jennifer Pietras

  • High Skills versus Family-Based Immigration Policy: Complex Considerations.

    By Nicholas Zill

    In the current era of rapid demographic and technological change, and massive refugee flows, there has been much debate in European nations and in the US about immigration policies. One of the major points of contention is whether preferences should be given to would-be entrants on the basis of their high skills (merit-based immigration) or their family ties to individuals already residing in the country (family reunification).

    Read more ...

UMD Jean Monnet Research Project

Infrastructure Planning and Financing: Lessons from Europe and the United States

The University of Maryland has received a Jean Monnet grant from the EU to conduct a series of policy exchanges between Europe and the US on filling infrastructure needs and the utility of public/private partnerships as the financing mechanism. If interested in participating in or receiving more information about these exchanges, please contact Rye McKenzie (

Read more ...

New from the Bertelsmann Foundation

The Bertelsmann Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan and nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC with a transatlantic perspective on global challenges.

"Edge of a Precipice" by Nathan Crist

"Newpolitik" by Emily Hruban


Summer Course