Iceland’s Acceptance for EU Membership Is Proving Trickier than First Anticipated     Print Email
Tuesday, 11 August 2009

Following its financial meltdown in October 2008, Iceland hoped that EU membership would protect the country from a similar economic crisis in the future, and six months later, in July 2009, Reykjavik applied to become a member state. The European Commission responded positively – in less than a week, a very rapid timeframe when compared to countries in the Balkans which have sometimes had to wait years before their applications were even considered.


Iceland is in a much better position than Balkan countries because it is already part of both the European Economic Area and the Schengen Area (the European passport-free zone) – which amounts to adopting two-thirds of EU laws. Altogether, Iceland seems to have an ideal profile for EU membership: it has a high per capita gross domestic product, a small population and a track record of political stability (at least until the crisis in October).


So Iceland’s bid is viewed positively by many European nations, especially its Scandinavian neighbors. Sweden’s Foreign Minister Carl Bildt announced that his country (which currently holds the EU presidency), favors accession. Specifically, he said that Iceland’s membership would reinforce the Nordic dimension of the EU at a crucial time of climate change when the Arctic and North Atlantic have become increasingly important both for natural resources and for new commercial waterways.

Technically, tough negotiations lie ahead over the fishing industry. Iceland has never adhered to the 26-year-old EU Common Fisheries Policy, which stipulates that EU waters must be open to any member state and are subject to fishing quotas. Fishing is very important to Icelanders, professionally and psychologically, so in the absence of a deal amounting to a special exception, there could well be a “no” vote on the EU application when it is put to a referendum, as it must be under Icelandic law. Polls in July 2009 showed that opposition to membership is rising in Iceland – up 10 percent in June to 48.5% of the population. .

Other complications come from EU member states. The Icelandic parliament has postponed any agreement to reimburse foreigners’ lost savings stemming from the bankruptcy of Iceland’s savings bank, the Icebank. Claims run to €1.3 billion ($1.85 billion) in the Netherlands and €2.3 billion ($3.3 billion) in the UK. The Netherlands is threatening to block Iceland’s bid for membership until such claims have been paid.

A speedy entry for Iceland has encountered opposition in Italy and Austria, which do not want to offend their neighbors in the Balkans by letting Iceland get so far ahead of these countries’ long-stalled applications. To head off potential social unrest, the European Commissioner for enlargement, Olli Rehn, offered visa-free entry into the EU by January 2010 to citizens of Montenegro, Macedonia and Serbia.

  • World Radio Conference Outcomes

    By Patricia Paoletta, Washington DC

    The latest World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) wrapped up in late November after four long weeks of negotiations between 3400 delegates from around 165 Member States. All in all, the WRC resulted in positive outcomes for both 5G and Wi-Fi, and will benefit both the U.S. and Europe's communications agendas, particularly with respect to the decisions on spectrum to be allocated for the all-important 5G service. The effect will be to ensure the more rapid development of the next generation of mobile broadband in a manner consistent with U.S. planning and existing development.  Debates on 5G dominated the conference, but allocations for high-altitude platform stations (“HAPS”) sought by U.S. based firms were also favorable. As a result, plans to provide additional internet service to underserved areas may be accelerated.

    Read more ...

UMD Jean Monnet Research Project

Infrastructure Planning and Financing: Lessons from Europe and the United States

The University of Maryland has received a Jean Monnet grant from the EU to conduct a series of policy exchanges between Europe and the US on filling infrastructure needs and the utility of public/private partnerships as the financing mechanism. If interested in participating in or receiving more information about these exchanges, please contact Rye McKenzie (

Read more ...

New from the Bertelsmann Foundation

The Bertelsmann Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan and nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC with a transatlantic perspective on global challenges.

"Edge of a Precipice" by Nathan Crist

"Newpolitik" by Emily Hruban


Summer Course